1972 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. (211 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 413 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |