1972 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac DeVille (211 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 770 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 6 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1355 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |
