1972 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. (211 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1307 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
