1972 Checker Aerobus vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Checker Aerobus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Checker Aerobus would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Checker Aerobus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Checker Aerobus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Checker Aerobus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Checker Aerobus. (463 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Checker Aerobus.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Checker Aerobus | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Checker | Holden |
Model | Aerobus | Maloo |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 463 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |