1972 Checker Aerobus vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Checker Aerobus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Checker Aerobus would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Checker Aerobus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 657 more horse power than 1972 Checker Aerobus. (186 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1972 Checker Aerobus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Checker Aerobus weights approximately 1325 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 527 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Checker Aerobus. (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Checker Aerobus.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Checker Aerobus | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Checker | Lotec |
Model | Aerobus | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6690 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1150 mm |