1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1955 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1955 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Biscayne | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1972 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 5112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2600 mm |