1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1961 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Biscayne | Munga |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 31 L |
