1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Biscayne | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 33 L |
