1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 1980 Zastava 132 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Biscayne | 132 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2560 mm |