1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1996 Ford Tracer
To start off, 1996 Ford Tracer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1996 Ford Tracer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Biscayne | Tracer |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |