1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 400 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Biscayne | Helem |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |
