1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Biscayne | Celica |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 622 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 87 L |
