1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Biscayne | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 439 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |