1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Biscayne | Covie |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 35 L |
