1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Biscayne | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 1810 mm |
