1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 142 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Biscayne | 9000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2290 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1807 kg | 1665 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 61 L |
