1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2008 Fiat Croma

To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.

Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Croma.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chevrolet Biscayne 2008 Fiat Croma
Make Chevrolet Fiat
Model Biscayne Croma
Year Released 1972 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4097 cc 2198 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5590 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 62 L