1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Biscayne | XC90 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 17.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 70 L |