1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2009 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Panda. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 667 kg more than 2009 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Panda. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | 2009 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Biscayne | Panda |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.2 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1807 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 35 L |