1972 Chevrolet Biscayne vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 512 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne has manual transmission. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chevrolet Biscayne 2010 Suzuki Equator
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Biscayne Equator
Year Released 1972 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4097 cc 3954 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 110 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1807 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 5590 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]