1972 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Camaro (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 377 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Camaro (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.2 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1457 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |