1972 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,011 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 983 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle (312 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Chevelle | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Chevelle | Elan |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5011 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1577 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |