1972 Chevrolet DeVille vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet DeVille would be higher. At 5,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet DeVille (233 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet DeVille weights approximately 358 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Chevrolet DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet DeVille (495 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chevrolet DeVille 2003 Ford C-MAX
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model DeVille C-MAX
Year Released 1972 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5732 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 233 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 495 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 88.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1684 kg 1326 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2650 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]