1972 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Impala (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 419 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Impala (256 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chevrolet Impala | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Impala | CJ |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 256 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2380 mm |
