1972 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 605 kg more than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Impala | RunX |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |