1972 Chevrolet Vega vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Vega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Vega would be higher. At 2,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Vega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Vega. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Vega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 115 kg more than 1972 Chevrolet Vega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Vega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Vega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 167 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 1972 Chevrolet Vega has automatic transmission and 2005 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Chevrolet Vega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chevrolet Vega | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Vega | Matrix |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2287 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 91.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |