1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1950 Maserati 8CLT
To start off, 1972 Chrysler 160 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 2,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 8CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 345 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1950 Maserati 8CLT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1950 Maserati 8CLT | |
Make | Chrysler | Maserati |
Model | 160 | 8CLT |
Year Released | 1972 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |