1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 1972 Chrysler 160 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 158 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chrysler 160 | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Chrysler | DKW |
| Model | 160 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
