1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1972 Chrysler 160 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 53 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 160 | 220 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |