1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | 160 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1972 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |