1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1978 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2430 mm |