1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1978 Seat 131
To start off, 1978 Seat 131 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler 160 (79 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1978 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 103 kg more than 1978 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1972 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1978 Seat 131 | |
Make | Chrysler | Seat |
Model | 160 | 131 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |