1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1980 Renault 5
To start off, 1980 Renault 5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Renault 5 (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 98 kg more than 1980 Renault 5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Renault 5 (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Renault 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1980 Renault 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | 5 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2590 mm |