1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1972 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | 160 | XM |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |