1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1995 Renault 19

To start off, 1995 Renault 19 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 79 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 128 kg more than 1995 Renault 19.

Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault 19. (110 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1972 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault 19.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chrysler 160 1995 Renault 19
Make Chrysler Renault
Model 160 19
Year Released 1972 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1068 kg 940 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2550 mm