1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 522 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
| Model | 160 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4960 mm |
