1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1998 Lotus Elise is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Elise (187 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1998 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Elise (193 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 160 | Elise |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 193 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2310 mm |