1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 242 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | 160 | Omega |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |