1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2001 Rover 75

To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: