1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2001 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chrysler 160 | 2001 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
| Model | 160 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 282 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |
