1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 217 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 160 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |