1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie

To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 1972 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.

Compare all specifications: