1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chrysler 160 2004 Volvo XC90
Make Chrysler Volvo
Model 160 XC90
Year Released 1972 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 320 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1068 kg 2038 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2650 mm