1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 207 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Taurus (251 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: