1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1112 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chrysler 160 2005 Volvo XC90
Make Chrysler Volvo
Model 160 XC90
Year Released 1972 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2433 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1068 kg 2180 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2720 mm