1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,802 cc, 2006 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (113 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Civic (148 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Honda Civic | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 160 | Civic |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1802 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |