1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Sierra (192 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Sierra (260 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2009 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | 160 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |