1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | 160 | TT |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2469 mm |
