1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2010 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
Model | 160 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |