1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Lada 110
To start off, 2010 Lada 110 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lada 110 (91 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lada 110 weights approximately 47 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lada 110 (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Lada 110 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lada |
Model | 160 | 110 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |